🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a misguided view of the European Union. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" agendas pose an existential risk to European civilization. However, this argument is based on a serious misinterpretation of the situation. The true danger confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Divide Separating Europe and the US

The data reveal a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, compared to a mere thirteen and a half percent increase for the EU. During this time, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, about half of the world’s top fifty technology firms are US-based, while a mere four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Question

This widening economic gap is driven by stronger productivity growth in the US, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This disparity prompts a vital question: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does Europe positioned? Most analysts agree it is largely a contest between two between the United States and China, with Europe entering at a clear handicap.

Root Causes of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several major reasons account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and agile network for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true unified investment market, which caps the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided rules hinder European business. A US startup can introduce a product under one regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population, is split among 27 different national systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward risk-taking differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was once viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has eroded its ability in breakthrough innovation.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to propose serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of major reforms.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, these assets could support much higher levels of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent still possesses significant advantages: high-quality workforce, excellent schools and universities, and world-class research institutions. Coupled with a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements could trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Importantly, even if Europe does not become the leader in creating next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase economic output by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now stands at a critical moment. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. But, if it fails to take bold steps to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's gradual weakening could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.